Can ancient theories
be debunked simply because they weren’t created using a computer? An old timer despairs…
AD: Hi, you were planning to check out a new house - aren’t
you going?
BC: I wanted to make sure that I set off at the right time,
otherwise...
AD: Right time? Good heavens, don't tell me you believe in
all that...
BC: Why, what’s wrong in it? It's not just a belief, it’s science.
AD: You're kidding! It's just a lot of old-fashioned
notions.
BC: So anything that's modern and has to do with computers
is logical – and anything that's ancient is mere superstition, regardless of
how accurate it might be. Is that what you’re trying to say?
AD: Well, if you choose to trust an almanac more than the
latest technology...
BC: In fact, your new-age software and operating systems are
released with so many bugs in them and need constant updates and patches.
Compared to that, our ancient technologies and calculations are so accurate
that they haven't needed upgrades ever since they were launched.
AD: But everything has to evolve...
BC: Thousands of years ago, we identified the concept of
time as being cyclic and not linear. That not only helped us understand stars
and constellations a lot better, but also enabled us to predict eclipses, full
moon nights and the exact time or sunrise and sunset for the next thousand
years. All of this was done without using complex computer systems and advanced
software...
AD: I still can't believe that you take this ‘zodiac thing’ so
seriously… But how did the old-timers do these calculations? Did they just
sprout wings and indulge in space travel?
BC: They didn’t, but age-old texts mention special flying
vehicles, called vimanas, that were designed to help them cover great
distances. Of course, there are those who have their doubts about the existence
of such flying machines…
AD: I still don't understand how...
BC: I was just making a point about how advanced people were
back then. But it’s a fact that it didn't take complex algorithms or satellites
launched into outer space for them to calculate this. It was all science and…
AD: So are you putting down current technology to make
ancient science look good?
BC: Of course not - I'm saying that modern technology owes
its existence to ancient civilisation.
AD: How is that?
BC: Sometime around 100 BC, a mathematician named Pingala came
up with a binary numeral system, without which today's computers, mobile phones
and other devices would be dummies.
AD: I've not heard of him at all.
BC: But I'm sure you would have heard about Panini, whose pioneering
work in creating a structure for Sanskrit grammar paved the way for our modern
computer programming languages...
AD: Yes, I've heard of that...
BC: And you can imagine what would have happened to
computers and the binary language if we hadn't come up with the concept of
zero...
AD: Sure, but...
BC: Wait, there’s more. Have you ever thought about where C and
Java would be without the Fibonacci series?
AD: So how does that link back to our ancient systems?
BC: The series would not have been possible if Fibonacci had
not adopted the Hindu-Arabic numeral system, which again, was the brainchild of
our mathematicians.
AD: Looks like all our past glory has gotten lost with
time...
BC: Speaking of time, ancient Indian scriptures have alluded
to minute calculations involving nanoseconds, which today, serve as a measure
of computer speed.
AD: At this rate, you will be telling me that today’s IT
companies wouldn’t have been around if it were not for ancient science and
technology…
BC: Well, considering the fact that we had come up with
numbers as large as 10 to the power of 100 as early as the 5th
century BC…
AD: That’s a googol, right?
BC: The name came much later, but just imagine - if we hadn’t
calculated the number correctly, the world’s leading search engine would still
be known as ‘BackRub’ instead of a misspelt version of googol.